timgreen7077
asked on
Exchange 2010 Dag Setup
Curious what you guys think, see below current setup:
DAG SETUP
1 dag
2 sites primary and secondary
8 databases
4 member nodes (2 per site)
Primary site is active
secondary site is passive
4 active and 4 passive DBs on node 1 in primary site
4 active and 4 passive DBs on node 2 in primary site
4 passive DBs on each node in secondary site
What do you guys think about this setup. I'm thinking about having on active DBs in primary and no passive replicas, and have the passive replicas to only in the secondary site unless failover. Curious about your opinions of this. I'm thinking this should help server performance also. Performance is fine but just thinking because I will moving to Exchange 2016 soon.
DAG SETUP
1 dag
2 sites primary and secondary
8 databases
4 member nodes (2 per site)
Primary site is active
secondary site is passive
4 active and 4 passive DBs on node 1 in primary site
4 active and 4 passive DBs on node 2 in primary site
4 passive DBs on each node in secondary site
What do you guys think about this setup. I'm thinking about having on active DBs in primary and no passive replicas, and have the passive replicas to only in the secondary site unless failover. Curious about your opinions of this. I'm thinking this should help server performance also. Performance is fine but just thinking because I will moving to Exchange 2016 soon.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER