• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 249
  • Last Modified:

C qsort compare function issue

I'm attempting to sort what would normally be a multi-dimensional array (CIDR block in 0, CIDR mask in 1) as a single-dimensional array of structures.  Using qsort, telling it the data size is the size of the structure, and a hopefully-clever compare function to compare only the CIDR blocks using structure offsets.

The compilation fails in the compare function with the error:

sorttest.c: In function 'ib_cmpfunc':
sorttest.c:22:27: error: request for member 'ib_blackaddr' in something not a structure or union
   if ((*(ib_arrayelement)a.ib_blackaddr - *(ib_arrayelement)b.ib_blackaddr) > 0) return 1;
                           ^
sorttest.c:22:62: error: request for member 'ib_blackaddr' in something not a structure or union
   if ((*(ib_arrayelement)a.ib_blackaddr - *(ib_arrayelement)b.ib_blackaddr) > 0) return 1;
                                                              ^
sorttest.c:23:27: error: request for member 'ib_blackaddr' in something not a structure or union
   if ((*(ib_arrayelement)a.ib_blackaddr - *(ib_arrayelement)b.ib_blackaddr) < 0) return -1;
                           ^
sorttest.c:23:62: error: request for member 'ib_blackaddr' in something not a structure or union
   if ((*(ib_arrayelement)a.ib_blackaddr - *(ib_arrayelement)b.ib_blackaddr) < 0) return -1;

Open in new window


Here's the code used to generate the test program.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>

#define BLACKLIST_SIZE 512

typedef struct {
    /* IPV4 address as 32-bit integer */
  unsigned long ib_blackaddr;
    /* CIDR mask as 32-bit integer */
  unsigned long ib_blackmask;
}  ib_arrayelement;

  /* Number of entries in the blacklist table */
int ib_blacklist_size;

  /* IPv4 address - CIDR mask blacklist */
ib_arrayelement ib_blackarray[BLACKLIST_SIZE];

static int ib_cmpfunc (const void *a, const void *b) {
  if ((*(ib_arrayelement)a.ib_blackaddr - *(ib_arrayelement)b.ib_blackaddr) > 0) return 1;
  if ((*(ib_arrayelement)a.ib_blackaddr - *(ib_arrayelement)b.ib_blackaddr) < 0) return -1;
  return 0;
}

void main (int argc, char **argv) {

  qsort(ib_blackarray, ib_blacklist_size,
        sizeof(ib_arrayelement), ib_cmpfunc);

  return;
}

Open in new window


The qsort compare function is too deep in pointers for me to follow what the problem is; I don't normally do anything this obscure.  Can someone point me at a solution?

Side note:  This is c on a Debian linux host.  Not C++, nor Windows.
0
Dr. Klahn
Asked:
Dr. Klahn
  • 3
  • 3
1 Solution
 
phoffricCommented:
http://ideone.com/iizCtE
See if this works for you.
static int ib_cmpfunc (const void *a, const void *b) {
  const ib_arrayelement* aa = reinterpret_cast<const ib_arrayelement*>(a);
  const ib_arrayelement* bb = reinterpret_cast<const ib_arrayelement*>(b);
  if ( aa->ib_blackaddr - bb->ib_blackaddr > 0) return 1;
  if ( aa->ib_blackaddr - bb->ib_blackaddr < 0) return -1;
  return 0;
}

Open in new window

0
 
Dr. KlahnPrincipal Software EngineerAuthor Commented:
Doesn't seem to be available on my system, at least not with the includes I'm using.  Perhaps it's only available in C++ ?

root@www: cc test.c
test.c: In function 'ib_cmpfunc':
test.c:22:31: error: 'reinterpret_cast' undeclared (first use in this function)
   const ib_arrayelement* aa = reinterpret_cast<const ib_arrayelement*>(a);
                               ^
test.c:22:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
test.c:22:48: error: expected expression before 'const'
   const ib_arrayelement* aa = reinterpret_cast<const ib_arrayelement*>(a);
                                                ^
test.c:23:48: error: expected expression before 'const'
   const ib_arrayelement* bb = reinterpret_cast<const ib_arrayelement*>(b);

Open in new window

0
 
phoffricCommented:
Right, C, not C++.

static int ib_cmpfunc (const void *a, const void *b) {
  const ib_arrayelement* aa = (const ib_arrayelement*)(a);
  const ib_arrayelement* bb = (const ib_arrayelement*)(b);
  if ( aa->ib_blackaddr - bb->ib_blackaddr > 0) return 1;
  if ( aa->ib_blackaddr - bb->ib_blackaddr < 0) return -1;
  return 0;
}

Open in new window

0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

 
Dr. KlahnPrincipal Software EngineerAuthor Commented:
Thanks very much, phoffric.  The second version of the compare function reversed the array, but there was no compile error.  Shortly after reviewing (again, but at least for the last time) some qsort compare example functions I ended up with this:

static int ib_cmpfunc (const void *a, const void *b) {
  const ib_arrayelement* aa = (const ib_arrayelement*)(a);
  const ib_arrayelement* bb = (const ib_arrayelement*)(b);
  if (aa->ib_blackaddr > bb->ib_blackaddr) return 1;
  if (bb->ib_blackaddr > aa->ib_blackaddr) return -1;
  return 0;
}

Open in new window


And it works as hoped-for, the masks are still "attached" to their CIDR blocks as the array is sorted.

mod_ipblock:  Blacklist dump
  Entry 0 38.38.38.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  Entry 1 38.38.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0
  Entry 2 38.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0
  Entry 3 255.255.255.255 mask 255.255.255.255
  Entry 4 87.87.232.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  Entry 5 16.255.0.0 mask 255.255.252.0
mod_ipblock:  Blacklist dump
  Entry 0 16.255.0.0 mask 255.255.252.0
  Entry 1 38.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0
  Entry 2 38.38.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0
  Entry 3 38.38.38.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  Entry 4 87.87.232.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  Entry 5 255.255.255.255 mask 255.255.255.255

Open in new window

0
 
Dr. KlahnPrincipal Software EngineerAuthor Commented:
Glad to have this one out of the way.  Excellent support from phoffric.
0
 
phoffricCommented:
Glad to have helped.
Keep in mind for future reference that the . operator has higher precedence that the (type) operator.
http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/operator_precedence
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now