Avatar of websss
websss
Flag for Kenya asked on

Dictionary and array of [N] size - performance tuned

Hi All

I have a temperature reading device.
I require to store the last N records of its temperature reading in an object
it will either be 5, 10 or 20 records

I was thinking of a dictionary with ID and array:
it should look like this:

ID, array of [N] records

i.e. in this example, there are 2 ID's and I store the last 5 temperature values

12345, 10.01
             10.02
             11.05
             11.02
             11.20

42133, 11.01
             12.02
             12.05
             12.02
             12.20

Open in new window


My first question is about the array ordering
Can i define the size of the array, and push to it so it always inserts the latest temperature at top, and discards the oldest record at bottom, always keeping the correct size and order? (if not what other object should i use)

second question, is there a better way to do this, maybe using a different object??
I will be reading and updating it once a second so it needs to be FAST as there could be a million ID's each with 5-20 temperature readings
C#ASP.NET

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
Fernando Soto

8/22/2022 - Mon
Nitin Sontakke

Please let me try to understand this properly. Are you saying that this not yet persisted anywhere in db? And you will persist this in db later and you want an intermediate data structure?

Or, this is already persisted and while fetching you want this structure?

At what level 5, 10 or 20 is decided?

Arrays will (to my knowledge) not provide a behavior you are expecting inherently. You will need to write one....complicated.

I am confused if you want a FIFO or FILO implementation. In either case both are implemented already as Queue class and Stack class.
Dr. Klahn

I'd use a circular rotating array.  This is about as fast as possible for the described application.

Circular rotating arrays are most efficiently implemented in sizes that are a power of 2.

Consider an empty array of 6 slots.  Initialize head pointer at 0.

0,0,0,0,0 <- head pointer
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0

Open in new window


Now add a data item to the array at the head pointer.  Bump the head pointer forward.

2,35,387,0,6
0,0,0,0,0 <- head pointer
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0

Open in new window


Keep adding data until the array is full.

2,35,387,0,6
6,0,80,9,5
2,2,0,3,0
6,0,3,0,13
7,0,40,0,6
93,0,1,6,12
 <- head pointer

Open in new window


When the head pointer overflows, reset it to zero.  Adding the next item destroys the old data in slot zero.

4,65,1,4,-3
6,0,80,9,5 <- head pointer
2,2,0,3,0
6,0,3,0,13
7,0,40,0,6
93,0,1,6,12

Open in new window


If it is necessary to know how much data is in the array, also keep a tail pointer.  The array can be implemented without a tail pointer if it fills quickly and there is no need to know whether the array is full.

Circular rotating arrays are normally implemented in sizes that are exponents of 2 is because end-of-array pointer checking can be done as an AND with a bitmask, not a conditional.
websss

ASKER
Hi Nitin

Are you saying that this not yet persisted anywhere in db? And you will persist this in db later and you want an intermediate data structure?
Yes its also persisted in DB, but we are caching in memory object for performance issues... this is a design decision which is not up for discussion, and has to be in memory

Or, this is already persisted and while fetching you want this structure?
We get the value first, then we persist in DB
When we get the data, we first need to persist into an in memory object, and then save to DB

At what level 5, 10 or 20 is decided?
UI level, it will be different for each device, and this is already taken care of


I am confused if you want a FIFO or FILO implementation. In either case both are implemented already as Queue class and Stack class.
FILO, the function behind this data storage is to take the last N values and output an AVERAGE value of the last N data.

I hope that clarifies ?
I started with Experts Exchange in 2004 and it's been a mainstay of my professional computing life since. It helped me launch a career as a programmer / Oracle data analyst
William Peck
websss

ASKER
Hi Dr

I'd use a circular rotating array.  This is about as fast as possible for the described application.

is this available in a .Net object?
Dr. Klahn

Sorry, I have no idea.  (I'm not a Windows programmer.)
Nitin Sontakke

You may wish to have a look at Stack<T> class then. Have a custom class having one property for Id and another as Stack for temperatures.
Get an unlimited membership to EE for less than $4 a week.
Unlimited question asking, solutions, articles and more.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Fernando Soto

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
or
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question
websss

ASKER
thanks, this is more inline with my thinking
whats the performance of a QUEUE like? i've never used before.
And using the deQueue, and add are efficient?
kaufmed

Define "performance". What part of this needs to be fast? The read? The write? All of it?
Fernando Soto

The Queue collection uses a circular array internally and seeming the number of elements being used is small and arrays have direct access performance should not be an issue.
Experts Exchange has (a) saved my job multiple times, (b) saved me hours, days, and even weeks of work, and often (c) makes me look like a superhero! This place is MAGIC!
Walt Forbes
websss

ASKER
awesome!
Fernando Soto

Glad to help websss. Have a great day.