A single global outside address and multiple PAT static addresses. Is this possible?

Our company is running out of IP addresses. We have several class C subnets. One is dedicated to switch maintenance. I can't get another public subnet and the present switch subnet is too full. We will need another 124 managable switches we call internal switches.  They willl handle only private static addresses. I came up with a technique to have a private unique address that follows the publics first octet with that octet swapped to an equivelant 10 subnet. The two middle octets are the same as the public switch addresses. We wish to have a close to possible maintenance access and track syslog and snmp data as our public switches operate.

I would like to take a Cisco router and set it up with a global single outside address and many private NAT-ed addresses. So far everything I am reading seems to require one each public and NAT-ed private scenario. I would need 124 global addresses to handle 124 NAT-ed addresses. I am hoping there is a way.

Outside.x.y.z:61 - NAT - Inside.x.y.61
Outside.x.y.z:62 - NAT - Inside.x.y.62
etc.

Please let me know if you need more detail or if I am going about this wrong. I am not allowed to use a firewall.
LVL 1
Robert HatcherNetwork EngineerAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

JustInCaseCommented:
Yes, it is possible. (if this is what you are asking for Port address transition).

ip nat inside source static tcp Inside.x.y.z1 61 Outside.x.y.z 61 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp Inside.x.y.z2 23 Outside.x.y.z 62 extendable

Inside.x.y.z1 - inside IP address                   61 - inside port
Outside.x.y.z - outside IP address               61 outside port
keyword extendable is needed to permit traffic from a single WAN IP address to mutiple inside IP addresses
0
Robert HatcherNetwork EngineerAuthor Commented:
The number "23" I assume that is a typo sir? You meant "62"?
0
JustInCaseCommented:
No, you can use any port you want. Does not need to be 1:1

you can have
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 80  1.1.1.2 80 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.1 80  1.1.1.2 81 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.1 80  1.1.1.2 82 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.3.1 80  1.1.1.2 83 extendable

outside port 80 will be forwarded to 192.168.0.1 port 80
outside port 81 will be forwarded to 192.168.1.1 port 80
outside port 82 will be forwarded to 192.168.2.1 port 80
outside port 83 will be forwarded to 192.168.3.1 port 80

You can do as you wish.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.