Exchange content filter blocking some internal scanners

I have several copiers that scan to email. One o fthem works just fine, you scan and the scan arrives in email. A few others, it's blocked with an SCL of 8. I have tried setting a relay, a bypass rule, restarting all services, changing the sender email address, etc. Nothing changes the scl value of these printers. What else can I try?
jsgrosskopfIS ManagerAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Hemil AquinoNetwork Security EngineerCommented:
Are you configuring the scanner via MAPI, pop3 or SMTP?
jsgrosskopfIS ManagerAuthor Commented:
smtp
jsgrosskopfIS ManagerAuthor Commented:
The log keeps saying content filter exceeded.Why is one scanner scl rating a 3 and the other an 8?
Your Guide to Achieving IT Business Success

The IT Service Excellence Tool Kit has best practices to keep your clients happy and business booming. Inside, you’ll find everything you need to increase client satisfaction and retention, become more competitive, and increase your overall success.

Download eBook now!
hdhondtCommented:
Have you tried white-listing the scanner's email address? In the Exchange Management Shell the relevant command is:

Set-ContentFilterConfig -BypassedSenders email-address

For more details, see

http://www.cryer.co.uk/brian/windows/exchange/2010/how_to_add_sender_exceptions_to_content_filtering.htm
jsgrosskopfIS ManagerAuthor Commented:
I'll try that tomorrow morning
jsgrosskopfIS ManagerAuthor Commented:
Added the scanner email address to the bypassed senders list, restarted transport server, still marking is as spam and sending to quarantine. Is there a different service I need to restart?
Hemil AquinoNetwork Security EngineerCommented:
Have you created a rule bypassing spam filter?.
That's only thing that should work. I've experienced something similar to you and that's how I fixed it. Of course knowing that is a trusted source.

Try creating a Rule in mail flow bypassing your spam filter, if it doesn't work then try deleting the user and recreating it. Sometimes might happen that something is wrong with the user.
jsgrosskopfIS ManagerAuthor Commented:
This happens to all the users that use these scanners. These are from the logs: I am at a total loss on this

30T17:17:09.371Z,08D51FB70AF59566,192.168.0.117:2525,192.168.0.57:44907,192.168.0.57,<20171030122841.77DF.SCANNER@filamatic.com>,scanner@filamatic.com,scanner@filamatic.com;,denise.petrucci@filamatic.com,1,Content Filter Agent,OnEndOfData,AcceptMessage,,SCL,3,,c6382bf8-5950-4a8f-151e-08d51fba0d70,,Incoming

30T17:18:00.514Z,08D51FB70AF5957B,192.168.0.117:2525,192.168.0.52:1050,192.168.0.52,<20171030114749.F2E1.SCANNER@filamatic.com>,scanner@filamatic.com,filamatic.com scanner@filamatic.com;,joe.grosskopf@filamatic.com,1,Content Filter Agent,OnEndOfData,RejectMessage,550 5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering.,SclAtOrAboveRejectThreshold,8,DV:3.3.5705.600;SID:SenderIDStatus PermError,33fc48c7-d46f-49aa-d8e3-08d51fba2beb,,Incoming
hdhondtCommented:
The scanner uses different senders for different scans, e.g.

20171030122841.77DF.SCANNER@filamatic.com
20171030114749.F2E1.SCANNER@filamatic.com

Try to whitelist the scanner domain, i.e/. filamatic.com, as shown at the end of the link I gave. You can also use wildcard characters, so you could try *.filamatic.com
jsgrosskopfIS ManagerAuthor Commented:
I finally gave up...installed a third party software, working great.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Seth SimmonsSr. Systems AdministratorCommented:
No comment has been added to this question in more than 21 days, so it is now classified as abandoned.

I have recommended this question be closed as follows:

Accept: jsgrosskopf (https:#a42351069)

If you feel this question should be closed differently, post an objection and the moderators will review all objections and close it as they feel fit. If no one objects, this question will be closed automatically the way described above.

seth2740
Experts-Exchange Cleanup Volunteer
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Printers and Scanners

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.