Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of Muhammad Asif
Muhammad Asif

asked on

Best Practice To Utilize Two 10 Gigabit Ethernet Cards For NIC level Availability.

Environment Details:

I have two Dell Rx730 PowerEdge servers on which I have deployed and setup Exchange 2016 server. Both servers are part of one DAG.  

Each server have two NICs of 10 Gigabit Ethernet Cards. Right now only one 10 Gigabit Ethernet Cards on each server is being used. I want to use other NIC as well for NIC high availability.

Questions:

1.  Should we simple plug the cable to another NIC and set the another IP of same network so servers can communicate with each other on two NICs  of same subnet. In this case if one network card fails then server would be reachable through anoter IP or NIC.  Can we do this way? If not then what is reason behined it?
 
2. We can create NIC teaming using these two 10 GB NICs. If NIC teaming is right option as campre to above one then what
     configuration from given below is best practice for Exchange.

1.  Switch Independent configuration / Address Hash distribution
2.  Switch Independent configuration / Dynamic distribution
3.  Switch Dependent configuration / Address Hash distribution
4.  Switch Dependent configuration / Dynamic distribution

Note: We are aware about PA for Exchange ( use only one 10 GB NIC) but as we have two 10 GB NICs on each server so we want to utilize them.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Bembi
Bembi
Flag of Germany image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Muhammad Asif
Muhammad Asif

ASKER

Hi Bembi,

Thanks for your reply in detail. Can you please let me know some more details regarding advantages of Dynamic distribution over Address Hash in switch independent mode?

1.  If we go with  switch dependent mode / dynamic distribution then whats it advantages over switch independent mode/ Dynamic distribution except bandwidth aggregation?  We do not need to aggregate bandwidth so now what you suggest switch independent mode/ Dynamic  or switch dependent mode/ Dynamic?

2.  Moreover, in Dynamic Configuration, shall we need to mark both adapters as avtive?
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Hi Bembi,

Thank you so much for your assitance and now things are very much clear to us. So we can configure the NIC Teaming as mentioned in attached screenshot for Exchange 2016?

If we configure NIC teaming with parameters LACP along with Dynamic  mode  (as highlighted in attached screenshot)  by plugin the each network adapter cable to separate switches connected with MLAG.   Is it better choice as compare to Switch Independent/Dynamic mode?  

1. I beleive in NIC teaming,  Teaming Mode (Static and LACP) are two different switch dependent  modes, if yes then what mode you suggest  for NIC Teaming Windows server 2016 for Exchange 2016?

2.  How we can proceed with these configurations. I mean we just need to ask the network team to configure two ports (of two network adapters) with LACP and then we need to create the NIC teaming as mentioned in attached screenshot at server OS level?

3: How we can find that LACP is porperly configured at switch level after creating NIC teaming with LACP option at Server OS level?

4.  What is difference between Static and LACP?
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Hi Bembi,

Thanks for valuable information.  I have now a clear idea on this subject and would proceed according to the discussions here.

Just one last question, when we create a NIC teaming, we see a virtual NIC interface as well. Do we need to configure the NIC protocols as shown in the below screenshot on the virtual NIC interface or on actual NICs?

User generated image
P.S. I have also attached the missing screenshot as a referrence to my above question. I would be using LACP with Dynamic mode as suggested by you.  Have you also use these two modes in any production Exchange environment?

User generated image
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Hi Bembi,

Thank you so much for all these details and I really apperciate it.  Is there any best practice or method to verify these configurations of NIC Teaming at switch level.

Is there any method of troubleshooting so we can verify that whether the configurations at switch level done by network team correctly or not. In-case of any issue, if they say yes, everything is working fine from our end then how we can double check. I am just asking this question at server administrator point of view.
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Bembi has provided  expert level valuable information.
Thanks you so much Bemi for such a valuable information.
Hi Bembi,

We have deployed the LACP NIC Teaming according to your recommendations ( LACP/Dynamic mode). However, we are getting the problem to start the Exchange services ( Exchange Frontend Transport, Exchange Transport, Information store) after rebooting the server.  

We have rebooted the server and once server is back online then we have checked the Exchange services and found that Exchange Transport is stuck in stoping as it always shows the status as stoping.

The Microsoft Exchange front-end service is keeping trying to start and sopting it self and never in running status.  Can you please help us in this regard.