Using PFR for Load Balancing.

Using PFR for  Load Balancing.

p

I  have the configuration below. I am supposed to see the load-balancing of the traffic between the paths R3-R4-R6 and R3-R5-R6, but I do not see it happen

R1#
interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.123.1 255.255.255.0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.123.3

Open in new window


R2#
interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.123.2 255.255.255.0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.123.

Open in new window


R3#
interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.123.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/1
 bandwidth 1024
 ip address 192.168.34.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/2
 bandwidth 64
 ip address 192.168.35.3 255.255.255.0
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.35.5
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.34.4

key chain MY_OER
 key 1
  key-string NETWORKLESSONS

pfr master
 logging
 !
 border 192.168.123.3 key-chain MY_OER
  interface Ethernet0/0 internal
  interface Ethernet0/2 external
  interface Ethernet0/1 external
 !
 learn
  delay

pfr border
 local Ethernet0/0
 master 192.168.123.3 key-chain MY_OER

Open in new window


R4#

interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.34.4 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/1
 ip address 192.168.46.4 255.255.255.0
ip route 6.6.6.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.46.6
ip route 66.66.66.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.46.6
ip route 192.168.123.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.34.3
!

Open in new window



R5#
interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.35.5 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/1
 ip address 192.168.56.5 255.255.255.0
!
ip route 6.6.6.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.56.6
ip route 66.66.66.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.56.6
ip route 192.168.123.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.35.3

Open in new window


R6#
interface Loopback0
 ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255
!
interface Loopback1
 ip address 66.66.66.66 255.255.255.255
!         
interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.46.6 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/1
 ip address 192.168.56.6 255.255.255.0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.46.4
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.56.5

Open in new window



from R1 and R2 I can ping loopbacks of R6

R1#ping 6.6.6.6
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 6.6.6.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
R1#ping 66.66.66.66
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 66.66.66.66, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
R1#

Open in new window


R2#ping 6.6.6.6
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 6.6.6.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/5 ms
R2#ping 66.66.66.66
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 66.66.66.66, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/5 ms
R2#

Open in new window



From R1 and R2 I am using ping to generate traffic:

ping 6.6.6.6 repeat 999999999 size 1500

However when I check on R3 with the command: sh pfr master border detail .  it looks like on R3 e0/2 interface Transmits and receive traffic, but e0/1 just receive straffic, it does not transmit
R3#sh pfr master border detail 
Border           Status                UP/DOWN             AuthFail  Version  DOWN Reason
192.168.123.3    ACTIVE                UP       01:16:23          0  3.3
 Et0/0           INTERNAL              UP             
 Et0/2           EXTERNAL              UP             
 Et0/1           EXTERNAL              UP             

 External            Capacity      Max BW   BW Used    Load Status          Exit Id
 Interface            (kbps)       (kbps)    (kbps)    (%)                         
 ---------           --------      ------   ------- ------- ------           ------
 Et0/2           Tx        64          57        64     100 UP                    2
                 Rx                    64        64     100
 Et0/1           Tx      1024         921         0       0 UP                    1
                 Rx                  1024      1024     100
R3#
R3#
R3#

Open in new window



Any Help ?

Thank you
jskfanAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
atlas_shudderedConnect With a Mentor Sr. Network EngineerCommented:
jskan -

Can you change the bandwidth statements on R3, wr mem, reboot and test again.  Please share:

sh pfr master border detail

Open in new window


after reboot and ping test.

I think that your bandwidth statement may be the source of your woes.
0
 
atlas_shudderedSr. Network EngineerCommented:
Add ip load-sharing per-packet to R3 - eth 0/1 and 0/2 for a quick and dirty fix or -

Check out this wiki to get into more guts:

http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/PfR:Solutions:BasicLoadBalancing
0
 
jskfanAuthor Commented:
I have added the coomand: ip load-sharing per-packet to R3 - eth 0/1 and e0/2, but it shows like e0/2 is not transmitting any traffic but it is receiving 100%. e0/1 is transmitting 100% and receiving 50 %


R3#sh pfr master border det
Border           Status                UP/DOWN             AuthFail  Version  DOWN Reason
192.168.123.3    ACTIVE                UP       00:30:07          0  3.3
 Et0/0           INTERNAL              UP             
 Et0/2           EXTERNAL              UP             
 Et0/1           EXTERNAL              UP             

 External            Capacity      Max BW   BW Used    Load Status          Exit Id
 Interface            (kbps)       (kbps)    (kbps)    (%)                         
 ---------           --------      ------   ------- ------- ------           ------
 Et0/2           Tx        64          57         0       0 UP                    2
                 Rx                    64        64     100
 Et0/1           Tx      1024         921      1024     100 UP                    1
                 Rx                  1024       520      50
R3#

Open in new window

0
Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

 
jskfanAuthor Commented:
Any update on This ?

Thank you
0
 
atlas_shudderedSr. Network EngineerCommented:
Also, on R4 and R5, can you confirm key-chain configuration matches the key on the master?
0
 
jskfanAuthor Commented:
I have had a chance to Lab it again... I will try to lab it and post  a question if I need to
Thank you for your Help
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.