Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of hypercube
hypercubeFlag for United States of America

asked on

SG300 Combining VLAN Trunks onto LAGs

I'm setting up a set of SG300 switches to support an added VLAN and to support  LAGs.
The LAGs should trunk the VLANs.
A simple case would be like this
Upstream (3-port) LAG Trunked <> Switch <> All of the other ports Trunked.

This is what I see::User generated imageYet, when I've tried to set this up, the Port VLAN Membership shows like this:User generated imageAnd, it appears that the VLAN 100 is tagged on LAG1
But, the ports belonging to the LAG (16,17,18) are sowing Excluded in Port to VLAN hereUser generated imageIs this last one normal?
Avatar of Predrag Jovic
Predrag Jovic
Flag of Poland image

If you can telnet, ssh to device - CLI show running would be more easier to read.
I guess it is OK since VLAN 1 and 100 are listed under LAG1, but I never worked with GUI of SG200/300 devices.

It should be listed in cli running configuration as (or something similar):
interface Port-channel 1
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport trunk allowed vlan add 1, 100
switchport trunk native vlan 1

vlan database 1,100

Open in new window

Avatar of hypercube

ASKER

Pedrag Jovic:  Thanks!!
I see this:
interface gigabitethernet15
 switchport trunk allowed vlan add 100
 lldp med disable
!
interface gigabitethernet16
 description "Teller LAG 1"
 channel-group 1 mode on
 lldp med disable
!
interface gigabitethernet17
 description "Teller LAG 2"
 channel-group 1 mode on
 lldp med disable
!
interface gigabitethernet18
 description "Teller LAG 3"
 channel-group 1 mode on
 lldp med disable
!
interface gigabitethernet19
 switchport trunk allowed vlan add 100
 lldp med disable
!
interface gigabitethernet20
 switchport trunk allowed vlan add 100
 lldp med disable
!
interface Port-channel1
 description "OPS LAN LAG"
 switchport trunk allowed vlan add 100

Open in new window


What is unfortunately perhaps called "Teller LAGn" where n=1-3 is the cable numbering for LAG1.

Ports 15, 19, and 20 are just bracketing entries.  They show "switchport trunk allowed vlan add 100" and nothing about VLAN 1, the default.
So that seems consistent with the LAG entry "switchport trunk allowed vlan add 100".
I rather get that "ports" means "individual non-LAG ports"  and any ports included in a LAG are subordinated to the LAG being treated as a "port" so to speak.  That's why ports 16-18 in the LAG aren't treated on the "Port list", eh?

I need this to work as there will be little time for "adjusting" during testing.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Predrag Jovic
Predrag Jovic
Flag of Poland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Thanks!

If the configuration is a simple cascade tree of switches then it's hard to imagine network loops.  Is that right?

Then is LACP still recommended?  Is there a downside to it?
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
I've implemented the LAGs with LACP.  All seems to be working fine!!
Thanks!
You're welcome.