WAN PRIVATE LINE CONNECTION - NETWORK LOAD BALANCE, IP BASED POLICY, HA

What is your routing protocol on the WAN?

Sounds like a job for BGP.

BGP won't get you inbound load balancing.  OSPF on the LAN side will get you outbound load balancing but BGP will only populate the one gateway/LAN entry point into the route tables.

we are using "EIGRP 100" on Site A and Site B. Please advise.

So you are running EIGRP over the WAN or on the LAN side?

over the WAN. Se below configuration.

Site A 20.20.20.0/24
Site B 30.30.30.0/24

Below is my Site B routing protocol info.

site-B-Router#show ip protocols
*** IP Routing is NSF aware ***

Routing Protocol is "eigrp 100"
  Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
  Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
  Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
  Default networks accepted from incoming updates
  Redistributing: eigrp 100
  EIGRP-IPv4 Protocol for AS(100)
    Metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
    NSF-aware route hold timer is 240
  EIGRP NSF disabled
     NSF signal timer is 20s
     NSF converge timer is 120s
    Router-ID: 10.10.10.1
    Topology : 0 (base)
      Active Timer: 3 min
      Distance: internal 90 external 170
      Maximum path: 4
      Maximum hopcount 100
      Maximum metric variance 1

  Automatic Summarization: disabled
  Maximum path: 4
  Routing for Networks:
    10.10.10.0/24
    30.30.30.0
  Routing Information Sources:
    Gateway         Distance      Last Update
    10.10.10.253         90      18:59:53
  Distance: internal 90 external 170

Can you, please, provide edge router configurations and routing tables of those two routers (also, please, mask/change any public addresses, remove passwords etc. , but keep some basic logic when changing addresses)?

show running
sh ip route vfr *

Select allOpen in new window

Here you go. i tried my best to edit this file. (Show run and ip route)
ISP# 1 is on 10.10.10.0/24 (Point to Point)
ISP#2 is on 10.10.5.0/24 (Point to Point)
Primary site LAN (20.20.20.0/24)
Backup Site LAN (30.30.30/024)
BACKUP-SITE-SHOW-RUN.txt

There are many potential solutions for what you want to achieve. Since you are using EIGRP you could use unequal load balancing.

Please, additional output needed:
show ip eigrp topology
sh ip eigrp neigh

Reason:
Both routes how to reach network via EIGRP must be known (present in eigrp topology table), so unequal load balancing can be used.

Other way could be to configure less specific network to advertise it on both interfaces (for failover) and more specific networks (to load balance traffic). Additional question is which type of load balance you want to achieve.

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 30.30.30.254 - looks pretty strange since switch is pointing to itself as the next hop.

LVL33,
sorry that's a typo when editing the file. the right ip route should be next hop:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 30.30.30.1
let me get you, your request.

LVL33,
Here is your request (below). Also please note that ISP#2 -IP address are 10.10.5.0/24. Connectivity is good, but after that i have not done anything else. I only configure ports with IP addresses on the Edge Switches.

SWITCH#show ip eigrp topology
EIGRP-IPv4 Topology Table for AS(100)/ID(192.168.1.254)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
       r - reply Status, s - sia Status

P 30.30.30.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2816
        via Connected, Vlan30
P 10.10.10.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 28160
        via Connected, GigabitEthernet2/0/48
P 20.20.20.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 28416
        via 10.10.10.253 (28416/2816), GigabitEthernet2/0/48

SWITCH#sh ip eigrp neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 Neighbors for AS(100)
H   Address                 Interface       Hold Uptime   SRTT   RTO  Q  Seq
                                            (sec)         (ms)       Cnt Num
0   10.10.10.253            Gi2/0/48          12 16:03:17    7   200  0  602
SWITCH#

LVL33.
ISP#1 bandwidth is 30/30
IPS#2 bandwidth is 50/50

how i can verify the HA and Load Balance?

Thanks.

Verify eigrp neighborship (if neighbors are present on both interfaces to other router then HA is OK)

show ip eigrp topology
sh ip eigrp neigh
sh ip eigrp interface

Select allOpen in new window

To verify load balance (equal or unequal load balance)

show ip route

Select allOpen in new window

There should be multiple ip routes for each destination network learned via EIGR.

But !!!!
If there is no configuration of bandwidth on interfaces equal load balancing will take place and you will get equal cost load balancing (both links, most likely, have the same cost). EIGRP routers will believe that on each link available bandwidth is 100Mb and with that actually you will, most likely, get 30/30 on each link.

Configuring bandwidth on interfaces and configuring EIGRP variance parameter can be used to configure unequal load balance and both links could be fully utilized.

There are other ways of load balancing traffic (for example - by prefix length)

LVL33,
Thank for your support. let's close this up. This is what my new configuration is going to look like.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
PRODUCTION

Int g2/0/48
Description ISP#1
Ip address  10.10.10.253 255.255.255.0
Bandwidth 30000

Int g4/0/6
Description ISP#2
Ip address  10.10.5.253 255.255.255.0
Bandwidth 50000

Router eigrp 100
Network 10.10.10.253 0.0.0.0
Network 10.10.5.253 0.0.0.0
Network  20.20.20.0
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
BACKUP SITE

Int g2/0/48
Description ISP#1
Ip address  10.10.10.254 255.255.255.0
Bandwidth 30000

Int g2/0/47
Description ISP#1
Ip address  10.10.5.254 255.255.255.0
Bandwidth 50000

Router eigrp 100
Network 10.10.10.254 0.0.0.0
Network 10.10.5.254 0.0.0.0
Network  30.30.30.0
Network 40.40.40.0   (Other Network on DMZ BACKUP SITE)

So, unequal load balance it is.

Check if 2 paths to destination networks are present in EIGRP topology table after bandwidth is configured on interfaces (it should be - to be able to load balance traffic (I expect that will be there, otherwise additional tweaking is needed)).

sh ip eigrp topology

Select allOpen in new window

If second route is missing, it should be present when sh ip eigrp topology all-links is issued.

If both paths are already present:

router eigrp 100
variance X  

Select allOpen in new window

X= <2-128> (1 is for equal cost load balance (default)).
variance 2 means that feasible successor that have 2x worse cost that successor can be implemented into routing table
Then you should have non equal cost routes to networks found in routing table:
sh ip route

Great. Thanks a lot.

You're welcome.