Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of Frank
FrankFlag for Ireland

asked on

event ID 1069: Cluster resource 'IPv4 Static Address 2 (Cluster Group)' in clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' failed (EXCHANGE 2010 SP3)

event ID 1069: Cluster resource 'IPv4 Static Address 2 (Cluster Group)' in clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' failed.

Hi all,

we have a Exchange 2010 sp3 2 node cluster that is repeating every hour the following messages:

event ID 1069: Cluster resource 'IPv4 Static Address 2 (Cluster Group)' in clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' failed.

Taking a look to the cluster I have seen that the second IP ADDRESS (cluster resource) is offline and it can not bring on line again.

This IP address is on the same network of the cluster network 2

the error is shown on the 2 bitmap cluster events 1 and cluster events 2

the resource ip address failed to failover from node 2 to node 1 and it still down.

My question are :

1) is it normal behaviour to have only one 1 ip resource active In a exchange 2010 dag cluster ? or both resources should be online ?
2) if the 2 resources should be on line , I don't understand why the second ip can not be on line since its an ip address that belong to the second cluster network.
(cluster network 2)
3) why the error event id 1069 is keep on being displayed on the event vwr every 1 hour for node 1

Many thanks
IP-CLUSTER.JPG
cluster-network-2.JPG
cluster-events.JPG
cluster-events-2.JPG
dag-properties-1.JPG
dag-properties-2.JPG
dag-properties-3.JPG
dag-properties-4.JPG
FAILOVER-ERROR1.JPG
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Amit
Amit
Flag of India image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Frank

ASKER

HI Amit,
thanks I did the test and there are no errors for the replica (see bitmap)

Now also the alert stopped and the last warning is from yesterday, so I guess that we can close this case.
test-replica2.jpg
Yes, everything looks fine to me in the test result. So, you can close it.
Avatar of Frank

ASKER

Ok thanks no further comments needed
No more question from user. Hence closing the question.