event ID 1069: Cluster resource 'IPv4 Static Address 2 (Cluster Group)' in clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' failed (EXCHANGE 2010 SP3)

event ID 1069: Cluster resource 'IPv4 Static Address 2 (Cluster Group)' in clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' failed.

Hi all,

we have a Exchange 2010 sp3 2 node cluster that is repeating every hour the following messages:

event ID 1069: Cluster resource 'IPv4 Static Address 2 (Cluster Group)' in clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' failed.

Taking a look to the cluster I have seen that the second IP ADDRESS (cluster resource) is offline and it can not bring on line again.

This IP address is on the same network of the cluster network 2

the error is shown on the 2 bitmap cluster events 1 and cluster events 2

the resource ip address failed to failover from node 2 to node 1 and it still down.

My question are :

1) is it normal behaviour to have only one 1 ip resource active In a exchange 2010 dag cluster ? or both resources should be online ?
2) if the 2 resources should be on line , I don't understand why the second ip can not be on line since its an ip address that belong to the second cluster network.
(cluster network 2)
3) why the error event id 1069 is keep on being displayed on the event vwr every 1 hour for node 1

Many thanks
IP-CLUSTER.JPG
cluster-network-2.JPG
cluster-events.JPG
cluster-events-2.JPG
dag-properties-1.JPG
dag-properties-2.JPG
dag-properties-3.JPG
dag-properties-4.JPG
FAILOVER-ERROR1.JPG
LVL 1
FrankSystem Engineer Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

AmitIT ArchitectCommented:
This is normal. At a time, one IP will be online. Goto EMS and run test-replicationhealth command and let me know, if you see any error.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
FrankSystem Engineer Author Commented:
HI Amit,
thanks I did the test and there are no errors for the replica (see bitmap)

Now also the alert stopped and the last warning is from yesterday, so I guess that we can close this case.
test-replica2.jpg
0
AmitIT ArchitectCommented:
Yes, everything looks fine to me in the test result. So, you can close it.
0
FrankSystem Engineer Author Commented:
Ok thanks no further comments needed
0
AmitIT ArchitectCommented:
No more question from user. Hence closing the question.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Exchange

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.