We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Pro's/Con's about the Meraki solution for Firewall/Switches/APs solution

115 Views
Last Modified: 2018-10-26
I am looking at switching from my physical old Cisco switches to a Meraki solution.  Anybody has any thoughts about Meraki, I'm planning to use their Firewall, switches and APs.

I currently am using Sophos for my firewall and the renewal cost for my subscription is a bit more than if I were to just outright purchase a Meraki hardware and subscription for 3 yrs.

Any major pros/cons?  The demo looked great for Meraki, but how does it work when it's actually in production and not just demo mode?

The other option is to purchase new Cisco physical switches, but those are more expensive than the Meraki solution.
Comment
Watch Question

Jeremy WeisingerSenior Network Consultant / Engineer
CERTIFIED EXPERT

Commented:
I like the Meraki WAPs a lot. But know that they will stop working if you don’t renew.

The firewall leaves much to be desired. VPN is especially lacking.

I don’t have much experience with the switches so I can’t speak to them.
DanNetwork Engineer

Author

Commented:
I have one vendor that is steering me away from Meraki, as they are saying they have a 20% failure rate.  
Not sure what to believe.   So you like the APs.
I have a friend that has tried a few APs, and he's not very fond of them either.

Ok, so the firewall is lacking, good to know.  The sales pitch from Meraki is that if you have all three, Firewall, Switchs and APs, it's tightly integrated system, and you have a lot of visibility into the system.   The demo was good, I did like all the data the APs have to offer compared to Ruckus.
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Commented:
This one is on us!
(Get your first solution completely free - no credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
Senior Network Consultant / Engineer
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Commented:
This one is on us!
(Get your first solution completely free - no credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
DanNetwork Engineer

Author

Commented:
Interesting points, it's true that if they want, Cisco has FULL access to my internal network, I mean, they have ALL the access, which most likely they probably won't use, but I guess it's a huge whole that is open.  

The firewall is very limited.  I think I'm going to skip on the firewall, but now I have to think about the switches, as they are easier to manage, but again the security concern, and I'm not sure about the reliability vs the traditional switches.

With the APs,  I guess they still would have full access to our wifi traffic if I were to go with the AP options.
 decisions, decisions.....
DanNetwork Engineer

Author

Commented:
Thanks guys for your input, since we're saving over 65% going with Sophos, I've decided to go with Sophos new Enterprise APs, so they will seamlessly integrate with our firewall.
Jeremy WeisingerSenior Network Consultant / Engineer
CERTIFIED EXPERT

Commented:
Glad to help. :)
Unlock the solution to this question.
Join our community and discover your potential

Experts Exchange is the only place where you can interact directly with leading experts in the technology field. Become a member today and access the collective knowledge of thousands of technology experts.

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.