Avatar of Dan
Dan
Flag for United States of America asked on

Pro's/Con's about the Meraki solution for Firewall/Switches/APs solution

I am looking at switching from my physical old Cisco switches to a Meraki solution.  Anybody has any thoughts about Meraki, I'm planning to use their Firewall, switches and APs.

I currently am using Sophos for my firewall and the renewal cost for my subscription is a bit more than if I were to just outright purchase a Meraki hardware and subscription for 3 yrs.

Any major pros/cons?  The demo looked great for Meraki, but how does it work when it's actually in production and not just demo mode?

The other option is to purchase new Cisco physical switches, but those are more expensive than the Meraki solution.
Hardware FirewallsNetworking Hardware-OtherCiscoSwitches / HubsNetworking

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
Jeremy Weisinger

8/22/2022 - Mon
Jeremy Weisinger

I like the Meraki WAPs a lot. But know that they will stop working if you don’t renew.

The firewall leaves much to be desired. VPN is especially lacking.

I don’t have much experience with the switches so I can’t speak to them.
Dan

ASKER
I have one vendor that is steering me away from Meraki, as they are saying they have a 20% failure rate.  
Not sure what to believe.   So you like the APs.
I have a friend that has tried a few APs, and he's not very fond of them either.

Ok, so the firewall is lacking, good to know.  The sales pitch from Meraki is that if you have all three, Firewall, Switchs and APs, it's tightly integrated system, and you have a lot of visibility into the system.   The demo was good, I did like all the data the APs have to offer compared to Ruckus.
SOLUTION
Dirk Kotte

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
or
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Log in to continue reading
Log In
Sign up - Free for 7 days
Get an unlimited membership to EE for less than $4 a week.
Unlimited question asking, solutions, articles and more.
Dan

ASKER
Interesting points, it's true that if they want, Cisco has FULL access to my internal network, I mean, they have ALL the access, which most likely they probably won't use, but I guess it's a huge whole that is open.  

The firewall is very limited.  I think I'm going to skip on the firewall, but now I have to think about the switches, as they are easier to manage, but again the security concern, and I'm not sure about the reliability vs the traditional switches.

With the APs,  I guess they still would have full access to our wifi traffic if I were to go with the AP options.
 decisions, decisions.....
This is the best money I have ever spent. I cannot not tell you how many times these folks have saved my bacon. I learn so much from the contributors.
rwheeler23
Dan

ASKER
Thanks guys for your input, since we're saving over 65% going with Sophos, I've decided to go with Sophos new Enterprise APs, so they will seamlessly integrate with our firewall.
Jeremy Weisinger

Glad to help. :)