Avatar of George Alexandov
George Alexandov
 asked on

RAID50 slow speed

My Problem is RAID50 slow speed.

Initial RAID Configuration:

  • Disk Drives: 6 HDD TOSHIBA MBF2600RC (600 Gb, 16 Mb, 10025 RPM, SAS, 600 Mb/s)
  • 2 Spans
  • Motherboard: SuperMicro X8DTU-6F+/6TF
  • RAID Controller: SuperMicro SMC2108
  • Virtual Group: RAID50
  • Polices:
    1. Access: RW
    2. Read: Normal
    3. Disk Cache: Enable
    4. I/O: Cached
    5. Disable BGI: NO
    6. Default Write: Write Through
    7. Used Operation System: Windows Server 2016

Result:

CrystalDiskMark Metrics:
Read [MB/s]: 221.5
Write [MB/s]: 38.30

Ubuntu Live CD Metrics:
Read [MB/s]: 270.1
Write [MB/s]: 49.5

Question:
What can I attempt to increase Write Speed?
Should I reconfigure RAID50 settings, or configure different type of RAID?
StorageWindows OSWindows 10AzureRAID

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
kevinhsieh

8/22/2022 - Mon
Jose Gabriel Ortega Castro

What if you try a RAID 10 (raid 1 + raid 0), you can do this in pair number of disks.
George Alexandov

ASKER
Is it a guarantee of speed increasing?
Jose Gabriel Ortega Castro

Use a calculator to determine the speeds
https://wintelguy.com/raidperf.pl
http://www.raid-calculator.com/
Experts Exchange has (a) saved my job multiple times, (b) saved me hours, days, and even weeks of work, and often (c) makes me look like a superhero! This place is MAGIC!
Walt Forbes
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Cliff Galiher

THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
See Pricing Options
Start Free Trial
GET A PERSONALIZED SOLUTION
Ask your own question & get feedback from real experts
Find out why thousands trust the EE community with their toughest problems.
andyalder

Hardly surprising it is slow, write-through cache due to lack of battery backup, you could turn write-back caching on, it is a gamble with the data but not so much as turning the disk cache on !

RAID 6 would make more sense than RAID 50 with so few disks, it's only when you get to several (about 7) disks that you need nested RAID. If you can spare the space RAID 10 would be much faster since it does not need 4 I/Os to perform one write.
kevinhsieh

RAID 50 for this configuration makes no sense. If you want best performance, use RAID 10. Best write and read speed. If you want more capacity at the expense of write speed, use RAID 5. Nothing else makes sense.

Note that normally RAID 5 isn't viable anymore due to large capacity disks with 10-15 UBR rates. However, since you're using smaller enterprise disks of a limited number, it is okay to use RAID 5 like it's 2008.

If you were using drives over 1 TB, the rule of thumb is RAID 10 or 6. If you had a really large number of drives, I would consider also RAID 60.