RAID50 slow speed

My Problem is RAID50 slow speed.

Initial RAID Configuration:

  • Disk Drives: 6 HDD TOSHIBA MBF2600RC (600 Gb, 16 Mb, 10025 RPM, SAS, 600 Mb/s)
  • 2 Spans
  • Motherboard: SuperMicro X8DTU-6F+/6TF
  • RAID Controller: SuperMicro SMC2108
  • Virtual Group: RAID50
  • Polices:
    1. Access: RW
    2. Read: Normal
    3. Disk Cache: Enable
    4. I/O: Cached
    5. Disable BGI: NO
    6. Default Write: Write Through
    7. Used Operation System: Windows Server 2016

Result:

CrystalDiskMark Metrics:
Read [MB/s]: 221.5
Write [MB/s]: 38.30

Ubuntu Live CD Metrics:
Read [MB/s]: 270.1
Write [MB/s]: 49.5

Question:
What can I attempt to increase Write Speed?
Should I reconfigure RAID50 settings, or configure different type of RAID?
George AlexandovAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Jose Gabriel Ortega CastroCEO Faru Bonon IT - EE Solution ExpertCommented:
What if you try a RAID 10 (raid 1 + raid 0), you can do this in pair number of disks.
George AlexandovAuthor Commented:
Is it a guarantee of speed increasing?
Jose Gabriel Ortega CastroCEO Faru Bonon IT - EE Solution ExpertCommented:
Use a calculator to determine the speeds
https://wintelguy.com/raidperf.pl
http://www.raid-calculator.com/
Big Business Goals? Which KPIs Will Help You

The most successful MSPs rely on metrics – known as key performance indicators (KPIs) – for making informed decisions that help their businesses thrive, rather than just survive. This eBook provides an overview of the most important KPIs used by top MSPs.

Cliff GaliherCommented:
Parity RAID (5, 6, 50, etc) and writr-through is gonna kill performance.

Better disks. A better raid type Write-back.. And tiered storage. For write intensive tasks, you'll need to consider those options.

For many tasks, read performance is far more important so your config would be fine. It is a matter of defining importance and bottlenecks.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
andyalderSaggar maker's framemakerCommented:
Hardly surprising it is slow, write-through cache due to lack of battery backup, you could turn write-back caching on, it is a gamble with the data but not so much as turning the disk cache on !

RAID 6 would make more sense than RAID 50 with so few disks, it's only when you get to several (about 7) disks that you need nested RAID. If you can spare the space RAID 10 would be much faster since it does not need 4 I/Os to perform one write.
kevinhsiehCommented:
RAID 50 for this configuration makes no sense. If you want best performance, use RAID 10. Best write and read speed. If you want more capacity at the expense of write speed, use RAID 5. Nothing else makes sense.

Note that normally RAID 5 isn't viable anymore due to large capacity disks with 10-15 UBR rates. However, since you're using smaller enterprise disks of a limited number, it is okay to use RAID 5 like it's 2008.

If you were using drives over 1 TB, the rule of thumb is RAID 10 or 6. If you had a really large number of drives, I would consider also RAID 60.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Windows Server 2016

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.