Recommendations for core switch infrastructure?

I am a network admin and looking at our switching infrastructure. I feel like it is not efficiently built, and it is aging. It consists of HP Procurve switches, some of them are V1910's, newer ones are 2530's. (Several were purchased to support a VoIP phone system). All switches are connected with trunks- this takes up 4 ports per trunk and only communicates at linespeed. What I think needs to happen is I need to build a new core switch infrastructure, remove the aging equipment, relegate the newer switches to edge roles for client connections, and select adequate infrastructure for the core equipment... whatever I get, I am planning to use cascades so we don't end up using half the ports to trunk and get better performance. Our network is not complex- we have an MPLS, an inter-building fiber link, 2 VoIP VLANs, and 3 subnets at this location. so we wouldn't need more than 8 VLAN's- right now everything except the fiber and the phones are on the same VLAN and separated by routers- I think that using the VLAN capabilities of the new infrastructure could replace routing equipment and optimize the network further. So my question is, assuming we are keeping the newer HP Procurves (The newest are actually Aruba's), which have GBIC's but no cascade ports, should we use Cisco's for the core switches, or stay brand-consistent with HPe/Aruba, which will become the edge switches? Any model or feature recommendations?
Thanks for the help!
LVL 1
it_medcompAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

N. SpearsSr.Net.EngCommented:
Budget will be your guide with this decision. Most Vendors now are making decent equipment now. From the speed perspective it sounds like you want 10g cores. What do you mean by cascade ports?
it_medcompAuthor Commented:
That might be an old Nortel/Bay Networks term I've carried forward... By cascade ports, I am referring to direct backplane connections. In legacy models, we would stack switches by cascading the connection down the stack switch by switch and then the bottom switch would cascade back to the top switch. It created on large switch with an 80GB connection rather than a series of ports trunked with slower speeds.
N. SpearsSr.Net.EngCommented:
Ah okay so stack ports.  Yeah, I understand what you mean now.
Ensure Business Longevity with As-A-Service

Using the as-a-service approach for your business model allows you to grow your revenue stream with new practice areas, without forcing you to part ways with existing clients just because they don’t fit the mold of your new service offerings.

N. SpearsSr.Net.EngCommented:
Being that you currently have the HP's, I'd probably stick with Aruba/HP. Then design the new topology around Multi Chassis Link Aggregation. for your access switches.
Mal OsborneAlpha GeekCommented:
I would definitely be looking at 10Gb for a core switch. A single "desktop" drive can saturate a 1Gb link. Modern servers with a RAID array and workstations with SSDs can easily manage 2-3Gb sustained, when copying large files. If you use any disk-disk backup, it will run well under half speed over Gigabit networking.

Sounds like you have some LAG (link aggregation groups) in place. This is helpful, however 4 x 1Gb links is NOT the same as a single 4Gb link, it only manages 4Gb if there are a lot of flows happening at once, and you get lucky.

Look like the switches you have in use now, unfortunately don't have SFP+  slots, hence cannot take 10Gb transceivers, however you should be able to get 10Gb NICs for your servers, and get the move happening.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
it_medcompAuthor Commented:
Thanks everyone- Each of you helped answer- N. Spears recommending to stick with the HP brand, helpful because of the Cisco aspect of the question, and Mal Osborne for recommending the 10GB ports and suggesting the SFP+ adaptors (even though they don't work with my switches).
N. SpearsSr.Net.EngCommented:
@it_medcomp

My first comment did in fact suggest 10g Cores. No harm no foul though. Take care. :)
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
VLAN

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.