Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of Jay Schwegler
Jay SchweglerFlag for United States of America

asked on

Load Balance 3391/UDP and 443/TCP for RDS Gateways

Looking for some help concerning the RDS Gateway Role and load balancing.

I have an pre-production RDS environment that contains 3x Gateway Servers. I have tested the environment by connecting through each one of the individual Gateways and everything works just fine.

I'm now at the point where I want to use my hardware load balancer to receive the connections and distribute them between the 3 Gateways. I would also like to use the UDP Transport on 3391 as well.

The part that I don't completely understand is that I'm assuming that each individual connection, which will be coming in initially on TCP 443 and then UDP 3391 would need to be routed to the same gateway?

It would make sense and be easy to set the LB up to balance both ports to the 3 Gateways, but without any specific load balancer magic, connection "A" might go to one gateway for 443 and a different gateway for 3391.

It's possible that I could be overthinking this and I'm not sure if this is a flat out requirement. In the case where the user initially connects on Port 443 to Gateway A, then the UDP traffic comes in and the LB forwards that to Gateway B. Does Gateway B know to forward that UDP traffic to Gateway A if all the gateways have the farm properties configured?

These are the things that I don't really know.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Michelangelo
Michelangelo
Flag of Italy image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Jay Schwegler

ASKER

Great, thanks for finding this, I didn't see this one when I was searching.

So I don't have to worry about matching the UDP to the HTTP, which solves that problem.

Only thing that's odd is the requirement for ip affinity for the HTTP. In the case of connecting clients that are all behind a NAT, doesn't that mean that they are essentially all going to get put on one gateway?
Basically yes. And there's usually a limit on the Number of sessions coming from a single IP.
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial