Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of Matt Kendall
Matt KendallFlag for United States of America

asked on

Is there a good inexpensive way to image a Windows 2016 server while online?

Hi,

I have a Windows Server 2016 that a 2 TB SSD has been installed in.  Is there a way to image this server to this SSD online and then have the old HDD disconnected and the SSD boot up normally?  I'm trying to perform this remotely so I don't have to be on-site to image the drive with an imager.  I use StorageCraft software but not on this system in particular.  But I could buy ShadowProtect SPX.  Would this allow me to do this or is there a better or less expensive way of doing this?  As ShadowProtect SPX Server lists for $1095 and this is a one time image.  Thanks in advance for your help!
Avatar of Robert
Robert
Flag of United States of America image

Try AOMEI Backuper.
I have frequently used it to do drive clones to SSD, you can install it and run the clone while server is on or you can create a bootable USB/CD and clone the drive offline. They have a free and a pro version. (both versions have the ability to clone a drive or backup a drive to an image for later restore)
Time for the clone varies depending on how much data you have on the drive but on average about 50 gig on a workstation takes about 15 minutes.
I would not recommend doing this while the server is online.  This is tantamount to trying to replace a plane engine mid-flight.  Even in a stable OS, the system partition is in a constant state of flux and taking an image while online unnecessarily (or more accurately restoring an image that has since changed) is a bad idea when it can be avoided. Schedule a maintenance window.
Cliff, "real" imaging software is able to work on a snapshot and create a consistent copy. People would have hell on earth if it were different...
I am aware. It's how 99% of backups work since VSS became a thing.

But again, backups are restored red after a disaster. Aka no other choice.  The backup Kay he *consistent* but it won't include changes since the snapshot (changes that can occur *DURING* the backup.

I'm comfortable from experience that imaging from a running system is best avoided *when possible.*  There is a reasoj, MDT, for example l, does the image capture from a PE environment instead of the running system. It wasn't absolutely necessary, but it is less error prone.
Offline images are less prone to errors and faster, that one is true. A backup however is not the same as a live clone - backups just need to be consistent, live clones need to be accurately reflect the system state at all times.
Current HDD-to-SSD cloning software does not just create a snapshot, that wouldn't work.

So it is important not to choose a backup type of imaging software if intending this kind of cloning.
Avatar of Matt Kendall

ASKER

Robert, thanks for the recommendation.  I'll give it a try.

Cliff, thanks for your wisdom.  I know it's definitely not ideal.  But, the office is very small and typically there's not more than three users using the server at a time.  I can have them all log off and turn off the database services on the server.  I'm doing this to see if I have the ability to mirror a running server drive remotely and then be able to boot using that drive that has been mirrored to.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Philip Elder
Philip Elder
Flag of Canada image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial