Avatar of oaktrees
oaktrees
 asked on

Word Row Merging - Double Height After Merge is Avoidable?

In Word 2016, if I merge two rows, the rows merge well, content-wise.  But, the resulting row is twice as big.  So, seems like using merge rows merges not only content of the rows but also the area.  

So, one question leading to another.  Is this behavior correct?  And, if so, is there any way to merge the contents of the rows but keep the size?  The two rows in this case happen to be the same size.

As I write this question I can see the logical difficulty - how would Word know WHICH row is the size to keep? (In my case the two rows are the same height) but I suppose the answer would be "the preceding row's height".  

Wondering if there's any way, or something built-in I'm missing that does something approximate to this?

Many thanks,

OT
Microsoft Word

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
oaktrees

8/22/2022 - Mon
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Noah

THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
See Pricing Options
Start Free Trial
GET A PERSONALIZED SOLUTION
Ask your own question & get feedback from real experts
Find out why thousands trust the EE community with their toughest problems.
SOLUTION
Rob Henson

THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
See Pricing Options
Start Free Trial
GET A PERSONALIZED SOLUTION
Ask your own question & get feedback from real experts
Find out why thousands trust the EE community with their toughest problems.
oaktrees

ASKER
Thanks! :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I started with Experts Exchange in 2004 and it's been a mainstay of my professional computing life since. It helped me launch a career as a programmer / Oracle data analyst
William Peck