Avatar of James Hancock
James Hancock
Flag for United States of America asked on

For phone games, can my own sketches of a copyrighted image avoid my own downfall?

Hi
Is Taylor Swift a ruthless legal vulture with Indiana Jones - Temple of Doom fiery-ruby eyes?

just kidding :)

In my phone game, I'd like to have pics/icons of everyday objects (sketches) in scenes for a points collection aspect. (and for level advancements)

If I do my own black and white sketches from images I find of Taylor Swift, or Metallica or Jimi Hendrix, or even an elephant, television, car, or an outline of Bolivia, cobweb..

What legal nightmares might I be heading into? Are original outlines of copyrighted images, or close interpretations (my own outlines) of them a path to the guillotine?
Is there a good way in photoshop to generate an amazingly creative approximation of a picture?

For an elephant, I might want icons something like this :

elephant icon
or of Jimi

Jimi Hendrix icon
or Taylor

taylor.jpg
Thanks
Game ProgrammingJava* Photoshop

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
James Hancock

8/22/2022 - Mon
dpearson

If you use somebody else's likeness (no matter who creates it - you or somebody else) in your product without their permission, they can come after you for that.    It's the fact that it's in a product (something you're looking to make even $1 from) that causes you to be in jeopardy.  That's the difference between you posting a selfie with Taylor on your instagram and you put that same selfie into your phone game.

But that's if you say "Taylor Swift" with an image you drew.  If you are using images that are similar, but not clearly identifiable as one person (i.e. it's a blond singer, but could be one of several people) then you should be fine because it's no longer an image of Taylor Swift.  But you're a good artist, so yours look pretty identifiable - which is a problem.  Even if you were walking a very careful line - close but not actually illegal, just being sued would cost you a fortune in legal fees, even if you won.  So don't push the envelope.

You can read more about the legal issue here:
http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/using-name-or-likeness-another

There's of course no problem using an image of an elephant or other objects as long as you created them.  If you're just applying a photoshop filter to somebody else's art - that's a different issue and again you can run into more trouble.  In that case you'd be violating copyright law, which is a whole different matter.

From a practical standpoint if your game doesn't do well nobody will care.  But if it actually takes off, it will show up on somebody's radar and eventually they'll come calling and you don't want that to happen.

Doug
James Hancock

ASKER
Thanks

That link is quite an eye-opener. It's basically a - dont-even-bother notice for the likenesses of big names.
I'm curious, how much would it cost to acquire Taylor's likeness, or for that matter, Cristiano Ronaldo or Hillary Clinton?
It probably escalates with brand-name magnitude. The cost of high-profile people must be quite something. ( exactly like in advertising)

But,
If I were to use my own drawings of Winston Churchill or Babe Ruth or Charles Darwin, Shakespeare, Mona Lisa, the Sphinx, Venus de Milo, Nelson Mandela (deceased), Thomas Jefferson, would anyone care?
I suppose other things like the Golden Gate Bridge, Big Ben, Niagra Falls, Mount Rushmore, would fall into a scenery category and have no jeopardy associated w them?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
dpearson

THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
See Pricing Options
Start Free Trial
GET A PERSONALIZED SOLUTION
Ask your own question & get feedback from real experts
Find out why thousands trust the EE community with their toughest problems.
krakatoa

Scenery is totally fine.  As long as it's your art of that scenery.  Mount Rushmore, Big Ben all fair game.

If you create it yourself, yes. But if you reproduce someone else’s depiction, you would be liable to copyright infringement. That’s infringement of that person’s work - nothing to do with the subject itself.
I started with Experts Exchange in 2004 and it's been a mainstay of my professional computing life since. It helped me launch a career as a programmer / Oracle data analyst
William Peck
James Hancock

ASKER
Thanks