- Git
- Web Development
- Programming
- Software
- Project Management Software
Is BitBucket the best choice?
Is BitBucket the best choice?
I am starting a project which will involve various developers, some offshore. I need a GIT Repo I can use for source code management and have good memories of BitBucket.
Is it still a great choice?
I saw a difference between Free/Standard/Premium that I dis not understand...
"Build Minutes"...
I do not recall using BitBucket to Build anything. What does this mean? To Build on BitBucket??
This site will have a EJS front end with a JAVA back-end. Does this mean on JAVA code commits, an auto-compilation can be configured? That is probably an option, I presume...it may be a very good option, but I'd like to understand it.
Thanks
I am starting a project which will involve various developers, some offshore. I need a GIT Repo I can use for source code management and have good memories of BitBucket.
Is it still a great choice?
I saw a difference between Free/Standard/Premium that I dis not understand...
"Build Minutes"...
I do not recall using BitBucket to Build anything. What does this mean? To Build on BitBucket??
This site will have a EJS front end with a JAVA back-end. Does this mean on JAVA code commits, an auto-compilation can be configured? That is probably an option, I presume...it may be a very good option, but I'd like to understand it.
Thanks
The standard choice these days is GitHub. But bitbucket is probably fine too. I would expect today that GitHub has the wider feature set.
Hi Curious,
There is no right answer to your question. BitBucket works on multiple repository types including Git but there are couple of differences. I like the GUI of Bitbucket, it has always been better than GitHubs. However, being a more commercial oriented offering BitBucket does not offer its free users more than 1 GB of storage per repository (GitHub gives 100GB - most of the code bases are never going to reach that limit though).
The build minute is a more of a CI/CD term. You can build your project, including testing and deployment steps in Cloud and each minute that is taken to complete this process is called a build minute.
A Build can import source code from the Repositories,then execute a build per your requirements, and produce artifacts (executables and more).and then it can import / publish these artifacts to the servers as per your requirements.
Regards,
Chinmay.
There is no right answer to your question. BitBucket works on multiple repository types including Git but there are couple of differences. I like the GUI of Bitbucket, it has always been better than GitHubs. However, being a more commercial oriented offering BitBucket does not offer its free users more than 1 GB of storage per repository (GitHub gives 100GB - most of the code bases are never going to reach that limit though).
The build minute is a more of a CI/CD term. You can build your project, including testing and deployment steps in Cloud and each minute that is taken to complete this process is called a build minute.
A Build can import source code from the Repositories,then execute a build per your requirements, and produce artifacts (executables and more).and then it can import / publish these artifacts to the servers as per your requirements.
Regards,
Chinmay.
To add... You may want to read the https://www.elegantthemes.com/blog/wordpress/github-vs-bitbucket (or you can find other comparisons).
Anyway, if you have a decent shared server (or if you can rent one), then the plain Git may be the best choice regarding the price and also the security of the data.Technically, GitHub and Git are the same (the same way of storing the data). You may want to read the following:
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-on-the-Server-The-Protocols
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Distributed-Git-Distributed-Workflows
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/GitHub-Account-Setup-and-Configuration
the most basic and fundamental difference between GitHub and Bitbucket, it is this: GitHub is focused around public code, and Bitbucket is for private. Basically, GitHub has a huge open-source community, and Bitbucket tends to have mostly enterprise and business users.
Anyway, if you have a decent shared server (or if you can rent one), then the plain Git may be the best choice regarding the price and also the security of the data.Technically, GitHub and Git are the same (the same way of storing the data). You may want to read the following:
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-on-the-Server-The-Protocols
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Distributed-Git-Distributed-Workflows
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/GitHub-Account-Setup-and-Configuration
Github used to be the go-to solution. That's no longer a no-brainer since Microsoft bought it. A lot of devs moved to Gitlab instead:
https://dzone.com/articles/gitlab-benefits-from-githubmicrosoft-acquisition
https://dzone.com/articles/gitlab-benefits-from-githubmicrosoft-acquisition
Explore More ContentExplore courses, solutions, and other research materials related to this topic.
-
![]()
received a Solution
Could you point if it's possible to clone a repository (Bitbucket on my case) from master with a named way ? -
![]()
wrote an Article
![]()
Automatically download files from the web - AutoHotkey Script
-
![]()
created a Video
![]()
Migrating the Website
-
Explore Cloud Class® ![]()
Bootstrap 4: Exploring New Features
Premium Content
You need an Expert Office subscription to comment.Start Free Trial