MohitPandit
asked on
Azure DevOps: History shows "gitName" as committed by
Hello Folks,
I am working with Azure DevOps (git) and for couple of commits in "release" branch. It is showing committed by "gitName".
FYI, we are three develops working on same branch.
Could you let me know, what are the reasons to show "gitName", not developer name?
Best Regards
I am working with Azure DevOps (git) and for couple of commits in "release" branch. It is showing committed by "gitName".
FYI, we are three develops working on same branch.
Could you let me know, what are the reasons to show "gitName", not developer name?
Best Regards
ASKER
But, in case the respective developer commits on "develop" or "feature" branch then, I can see respective developer name. But for "release" branch is showing "gitName" as committed by.
Does git configuration setting apply branch to branch?
Does git configuration setting apply branch to branch?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Make sure each developer configures its own work environment(s) properly.
Open in new window
Some additional info on Azure DevOps herehttps://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/git-names?view=azure-devops
Also, git first time conf focs:
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-First-Time-Git-Setup