Internet Protocol Security

Internet Protocol Security (IPsec) is a protocol suite for secure Internet Protocol (IP) communications by authenticating and encrypting each IP packet of a communication session. IPsec includes protocols for establishing mutual authentication between agents at the beginning of the session and negotiation of cryptographic keys to be used during the session. IPsec can be used in protecting data flows between a pair of hosts (host-to-host), between a pair of security gateways (network-to-network), or between a security gateway and a host (network-to-host). IPsec is an end-to-end security scheme operating in the Internet Layer of the Internet Protocol Suite.

Share tech news, updates, or what's on your mind.

Sign up to Post

What is the difference between  SSL vs IPsec VPN? Both needs tunnelng?
0
Free Tool: ZipGrep
LVL 9
Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

So I've been tasked with creating an IPSec VPN using a Cisco RV325. I've followed through several guides to get this setup and as it currently stands, I've managed to create the tunnel, connect and authenticate to the VPN successfully using the Shrewsoft VPN Client. However, once connected with either the IPSec VPN or the EasyVPN, I am able to ping the internal address of the router, but unable to ping any other device on the remote LAN. I've made sure firewalls are turned off for testing purposes just to ensure the packets aren't being blocked. I've also tried RDP connections to devices with no joy.

Interestingly, when I tried using the PPTP VPN through the RV325 (using windows 'connect to a network') I'm able to ping everything and remote access servers etc.

I've noticed that the RV325 will give you a virtual IP address range (which the VPN client is picking up) although it seems like there's no kind of address translation or routing to the subnet I need to get to. My remote LAN uses 172.16.8.x/24, the virtual addresses use 172.16.9.x/24.

Please let me know if any log files, config files or screenshots of anything would be of any troubleshooting help and I'll get them posted. Any ideas welcome!

Many thanks in advanced,
Luke
0
Hey guys,

I´m troubleshooting very interesting issue...we have a branch connected over IPsec (setup on Mikrotik)...everything works pretty much fine but network drivers...when users wants to open it it takes very long time to open it approx 5 mins...if they connect over VPN everything is fine. Any ideas? We use 3des encryption for IPsec

Thank you very much!!

Regards

Jiri
0
Hi All,
We have a Draytek 2960 setup with a teleworker dial-in connection using L2tp over IPSEC and it works perfectly for all users apart from those using Hp Elitebooks! The connection always fails with an Error 809 even though we can connect with the same details using another laptop from the same remote office.
We've even installed the draytek vpn client but that fails with an unknown error. I have switched off the antivirus and the firewall and this doesnt help.
Has anyone got any ideas?
0
Hi There,

We have recently acquired a  new mail base and we need to sync the data over to our new server.
However we have encountered a problem where the passwords are encrypted.
There are 2 passwords, digest password: digestPassword = {SSHA}TWcg67eMGQn428d3dS4HbZJqytpFMkku182nLQ==
and encrypted password. I was given a key RSA-X.509 to decrypt it but unsure how to go about so.
Please could someone kindly advise as we have around 50k mailboxes to copy over.
Thanks
0
I have a laptop that can connect to wireless and wired networks (detected) but has no internet (unidentified).

When setting static to the network, detects network name but no internet.

Cannot manually start the service.

Also cannot navigate to 127.0.0.1 or localhost - access denied.

I have scanned for malware, checked that everything is set to DHCP, re-installed NIC driver, reset using netsh int ip reset, netsh int tcp reset, netsh winsock reset.

Minitoolbox showed an error saying an attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions.

Any help would be greatly appreciated
0
Hi,
 
I have a Windows 2016 Hyper-V server box that came with two network cards. First NIC is connected to internal LAN (192.168.1.x) and 2nd NIC is connected directly to ISP Internet modem (therefore, it receives a dynamic public IP address given by ISP DHCP server). On 2nd NIC,  I intend to create a virtual machine ("TESTVM") where I like to try to open some suspicious email attachments or click on website links (to find out whether they are malicious). I have installed Malwarebytes Anti-Exploits/Anti-Malware/Ransomware on this VM and it sends me email alerts whenever it detects "suspecious" activity.
I plan on connecting to this VM thru remote desktop connection program (port# 3389, 3390 .. etc) using Dynamic DNS.
Having said that, I know a lot of experts would go against the idea of exposing the server to public internet.

I know that I could put another router (192.168.2.x) between 2nd NIC and ISP internet modem to enhance security, but what I like to know is how am I venerable as it is?
How could hackers penetrate to this server when the only account is "administrator" with secure password?

Thanks you for your insight.
0
Hi, So this used to work so I am baffeled at the moment. Lets say the networks are below.. 2 Cisco ASA 5501 one on side 5510 on other.

TUNNEL IS UP:
VLAN location 1: X.X.20.0 /24
VLAN location 2: X.X.30.0 /24

I see on both asdm the icmp packages being transmitted, "built" never says fail.  but it does not ping on local clients.
if I do a traceroute from 5505 it atleast goes out a few hops.
but if I go to the 5510, I get zero hops, as if its not leaving the asa at all..

I see network objects defined for both, I have static routes defined for both

anything I am missing ? without me pasting my config I mean, just anything very obvious?? TY ALL
0
Need help on configuring IPsec VPN site to site VPN Tunnel between two sites. But the requirement is that I have to NAT all my local subnet (e.g. 10.1.1.0/24) to single IP (e.g. 172.16.0.50/32) and send it through the tunnel for remote traffic (e.g. 10.2.2.0/24). Please see the attached diagram for details.

I am OK setting up IPsec Site-to-Site Tunnel using the wizard between local network 10.1.1.0/24 to remote network 10.2.2.0/24.  But this specific remote site require we NAT all our local network to a single private IP and send it over the tunnel... as they will only accept traffic from this NATed single private IP (172.16.0.50/32) only.

Cisco ASA 8.x
Drawing1.PNG
0
Hi,

I'm french, so my english isn't perfect...

I have a client with this network :
- 10 remote sites with CISCO ASA 5505 connected to a CISCO ASA 5520 (in the main agency).

Example :
A is connected to B (IPSec Tunnel)
B is connected to C (IPSec Tunnel)

I would like for site A to be able to get to site C through site B without create a new VPN Tunnel...

I don't know how I can do that...
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

I have the above phone trying to VPN with a Dell SonicWall TZ400. When I put in the VPN information, listed below, the phone fails and gives me error codes that Phase 2 no response. I will list the three error codes I also see, if anyone can point me in the right direction.

SonicWALL

SonicWall VPN Settings:

Policy Type: Tunnel Interface
Authentication Method: IKE using Preshared Secret

IPsec Primary Gateway Name or Address: 0.0.0.0

IKE Authentication:

Local IKE ID: Domain Name
Peer IKE ID: Domain Name

IKE (Phase 1) Proposal:

Exchange: Aggressive Mod
DH Group: 2
Encryption: 3DES
Authentication: SHA1
Life Time: 28800

IPsec (Phase 2) Proposal:

Protocol: ESp
Encryption: 3DES
Authentication: SHA1
Enable Perfect Forward Secrecy: Checked
DH Group: 2
Life time: 28800

In advanced tab, the only thing checked is Keep Alive.

PHONE

Server: 50.XX.XX.209
IKE ID: VPNPhone
PSK: *****
IKE Parameters: DH2-3DES-SHA1
IPSEC Parameters: DH2-3DES-SHA1
VPN Start Mode: Boot

Password Type: N/A
Encapsulation: RFC
IKE Parameters: DH2-3DES-SHA1
IPSEC Parameters: DH2-3DES-SHA1

Copy TOS: No
File Srvr: Blank
QTest: Disable
Connectivity Check: Never

Errors

1/3
IKE Phase1 received notify
Error Code: 3997698:18
Module: NOTIFY:305

2/3
IKE Phase2 no response
Error code: 397700:0
Module: IKMPD:353

3/3
IKE Phase2 no response
Error code: 3997700:0
Module: IKECFG:1184
0
Hi Experts,

On our public-facing OWA server on IIS 7, we turned on IP Address and Domain Restriction. If from the log we detect any IP trying brute force to log into our Web Outlook interface, we will put the IP into "Deny Restriction Rule" in the hope that IP will be 'blocked', meaning not even able to get the login screen. Actually it seems to be a wishful thinking since we noticed one of the IP we already added in the 'Deny' list that particular ip still keeps showing up in the log and we can see it got the login form and then denied with sc-status 401-1.

My question is, it seems this feature does NOT "block" the IP from getting the login form, but instead simply "deny" their login request. Is it correct?
0
Hello Expert,

I have an issue with an IPSEC configuration on a ASR 1001-X. I use a crypto map based implementation but it's not working. I make a capture on the device facing the ASR and I have no ESP packet out of the ASR. I can ping the remote IPSec peer but nothing else.

Below the configuration, did you see something missing ?

ip vrf Ivrf
 description Clear side VRF
!
ip vrf Fvrf
 description Cypher side VRF (front door vrf)
 
crypto keyring Key_test vrf Fvrf
  pre-shared-key address 4.4.4.1 key toto123
 
crypto isakmp policy 1
 encr 3des
 hash md5
 authentication pre-share
 group 2
 
 
crypto isakmp profile ISAK_TEST
   vrf Ivrf
   keyring Key_test
   self-identity address
   match identity address 4.4.4.1 255.255.255.255 Fvrf
   initiate mode aggressive
   local-address Loopback2
   
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-NULL esp-null esp-sha-hmac
 mode tunnel
 
crypto map CRYPTO_TEST 1 ipsec-isakmp
 description TEST
 set peer 4.4.4.1
 set security-association lifetime kilobytes disable
 set security-association lifetime seconds 28800
 set security-association idle-time 28800
 set transform-set ESP-NULL
 set isakmp-profile ISAK_TEST
 match address CRYPTOACL_TEST
 reverse-route remote-peer 4.4.4.1 static
 
interface Port-channel1.419
 description cypher side interface
 encapsulation dot1Q 419
 ip vrf forwarding Fvrf
 ip address 10.58.10.26 255.255.255.248
 standby version 2
 standby 419 ip 10.58.10.25
 standby 419 …
0
We have several small networks connected to our corporate office over IPSec tunnels. At our office, we have a Windows 2008 R2 server running NPS performing RADIUS authentication with WAPs. Up until now, everything has been running fine. But we connected a new office and we can't get any of our client working on the WAP at the remote office. We can see the RADIUS authentication request come from the WAP across the VPN and hit the server, the server responds back to the WAP, but then nothing happens on the requesting client. All other traffic over the VPN comes across without issue.

The difference at this new network is that we're trying a Netgate PFsense firewall instead of our normal SonicWall. The only thing I can come up with is the Pfsense firewall is interfering with the WAP in some form, but so far I haven't found anything that would prevent that.

The WAPs being used (at both old and new locations) are Open-Mesh MR1750v2
0
Hello Community,



I have created an VPN as shown in the attached configs. The tunnel is up and ipsec appears to working fine. However, I'm unable to ping the address 10.1.0.4 (interface on the router) from the other site with address 10.12.0.4. I think the problem might be that traffic isn't being recognized in the ipsec tunnel as shown here:



cisco-csr-vpn#show crypto ipsec sa

interface: Tunnel1
Crypto map tag: Tunnel1-head-0, local addr 10.1.0.4

protected vrf: (none)
local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0)
remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0)
current_peer 52.184.181.0 port 4500
PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
#pkts encaps: 80, #pkts encrypt: 80, #pkts digest: 80
#pkts decaps: 83, #pkts decrypt: 83, #pkts verify: 83
#pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
#pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0
#pkts not decompressed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
#send errors 0, #recv errors 0

local crypto endpt.: 10.1.0.4, remote crypto endpt.: 52.184.181.0
plaintext mtu 1422, path mtu 1500, ip mtu 1500, ip mtu idb GigabitEthernet1
current outbound spi: 0xEC0058AA(3959445674)
PFS (Y/N): N, DH group: none

inbound esp sas:
spi: 0xE8D52690(3906283152)
transform: esp-256-aes esp-sha-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel UDP-Encaps, }
conn id: 2002, flow_id: CSR:2, sibling_flags FFFFFFFF80000048, crypto map: Tunnel1-head-0
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4607992/3051)
IV size: 16 bytes
replay …
0
I need to migrate a VPN tunnel with 70 lines of cryptomap. The PAN GUI appears to permit my only adding
a single line at one time. I see that I can add security rules via CLI. Perhaps there is something similar for
adding an IPsec tunnel and its Proxy IDs? Any other thoughts apprecaited.

set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH from corpfw2-untrust
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH to corp-vpn
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH source RFC-1918
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH destination any
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH source-user any
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH category any
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH application [ ssh ssh-tunnel]
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH service application-default
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH hip-profiles any
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH action allow
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH profile-setting group Corp-Default-SecPro1
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH log-start yes
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH log-setting logmaster1
set rulebase security rules Inbound-SSH disabled yes
0
Is there anyway to monitor the email clients IP addresses on Exchange 2016 ?? especial on smart phones
0
Hello Master.
 
i have a fortigate  60D and a Cyberoam, and i had been configure VPN IPSec between it.
the VPN is connected but i cant access the computer (RDP, PING, WEB, HTTPS) in the other side.
i try to allow connection in filter rule in the both side, but i still cant access.
i try step by step in this link, and still cant access

https://kb.cyberoam.com/default.asp?id=1945
 
any suggestion for my case? some tutorial link or something i must to do.

Thanks Very Much
0
hello everyone,

I have Juniper SSG5, and I try to connect VPN site to site. I cannot find the problem of this message.

"Rejected an IKE packet on ethernet0/0 from xx.xx.xx.x:500 to xx.xx.xx.x:500 with cookies ... because An unencrypted packet unexpectedly arrived."

Please anyone help me.

Thank you.
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Pros,

This year I have a project to set up Cisco PFR technology to optimize company's network. The company has 6 offices (A to F) all over the world which connects to each other by IPSec over GRE tunnels over the internet.

Unlike some traditional PFR scenarios, we don't have a hub-spoke deployment. Instead, the 6 offices are fully meshed with each other. Each office has 1-2 VPN routers and each VPN router linked with two different ISPs. Any two offices are connected over encrypted point to point GRE tunnels.

My questions is: am I able to configure PFRv3 based on this point to point GRE tunnels deployment rather than changing the whole infrastructure to DMVPN/multi-point GRE tunnels? Is it supported by some Cisco user guide?

What we want to achieve is to always use the low latency/packet loss GRE tunnel as the active network connection between the two offices/countries. The current network topology is too complicated so we want to minimize the changes. Configurations samples of one office are as below:

[ Cisco ISR4431 ]

interface Tunnel22
  ip address 192.168.240.77 255.255.255.252
 tunnel source x.x.x.x
 tunnel destination x.x.x.x
 tunnel protection ipsec profile corporate-ipsec
!
interface Tunnel23
 ip address 192.168.240.101 255.255.255.252
 ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
 tunnel source x.x.x.x
 tunnel destination x.x.x.x
 tunnel protection ipsec profile corporate-ipsec
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
!
0
I'm not a networking expert, it's my least favorite part of IT, so I may well have missed something during setup, but I had thought that in my research I read that IP Security would be transparent to applications. Because of that, I am very confused as to why this error started appearing in Internet Explorer after I rolled out the IPSec policy:

IE Error from IPSec
Clients on the network connect to the Webserver that hosts the site without issue.  This issue started when the database server, picked up the settings and the webserver and DB server started communicating encrypted.  Also, TLS 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 are enabled on all machines in our domain through GPO, SSL 2.0 and 3.0 are disabled in the same policy.

Please let me know if you need more info, but any help that anyone can provide will be greatly appreciated.
0
I am having issues with 4 sties. Each have 4 ipsec vpn tunnel inbetween to cross connection and application access.

But only one application is giving me an issue. The server is on Site (A) and site (B) but soon to be (A) only. Two other site (C) and (D) are VPNing in to site (A) to access the server.

When you minimize the application (which is working true a RPD connection) and work on something else, once you get back to the application there is a reconnecting issue. Takes about 2-3 mins to get the application back working.

I've been having some issue with the VPN and I am not a pro with vpn log. Can anyone help me?

2017-02-01, 08:12:08      VPN Log      [g2gips0] #8461: [Tunnel Established] IPsec SA established {ESP=>0xc7488fd9 < 0xcd1b9f35}
2017-02-01, 08:12:08      VPN Log      [g2gips0] #8454: [Tunnel Authorize Fail] ignoring Delete SA payload: PROTO_IPSEC_ESP SA(0xcee3770f) not found (maybe expired)
2017-02-01, 08:15:15      VPN Log      [g2gips0] #8462: [Tunnel Established] sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established
2017-02-01, 08:19:30      VPN Log      [g2gips3] #8463: [Tunnel Established] sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0xc8dcbf5b < 0xcc9dcbd1 AH=>0xca3fff03 < 0xc2c1a9a1}
2017-02-01, 08:19:30      VPN Log      [g2gips3] #8456: [Tunnel Authorize Fail] ignoring Delete SA payload: PROTO_IPSEC_ESP SA(0xcf402c1f) not found (maybe expired)
2017-02-01, 08:19:30      VPN Log      [g2gips3] #8456: [Tunnel Authorize Fail] ignoring Delete SA payload: PROTO_IPSEC_AH SA(0xc8a48df1) not found (maybe expired)
2017-02-01, …
0
Current config: ASA-5505, vASA 8.2 (5).  Serves our 1-15 host network, and has a site-to-site IPSec VPN to a client configured (establishes automatically).  Of course, all non local or internet traffic is sent to the VPN.  Been working great for over a year no hiccups.
Eth0 is the "outside" interface (security level 0), Eth1-7 are the "inside" interfaces, security level 100.  All Ipv4, no ipv6.

I'm adding a remote office, and I want the remote office to effectively act as part of the original local office.  It will have its own 5505 device, and a static ip address(s) from our ISP.  I plan to use a 2nd site-to-site VPN to connect.  The particulars are where I'm lost a bit - Cisco firewall configuration is not my forte.  How I envision the remote office to behave is hosts there will obtain their ip address via the local 5505.  The VPN there needs to act pretty much as a NAT bridge.  The remote office will still need the same access to our site-to-site client, and also appear as hosts "of" our original local network.  They would have their own ip4 subnet.  The default gateway would be the inside ip address of the local 5505.
So it seems easy on the side of the new office I think.

Now the current local office:
Here's my guesses so far:  I have multiple public ip's to use, so set another "unused" current 5505 eth physical port as one of our other public ip's?  It appears this is set as a different VLAN? (Eth0 is currently VLAN2, Eth1-7 is VLAN1).  Then, create a …
0
I would like to configure Hong Kong Site H3C MSR 810 using IPSec site to site VPN to Singapore pfSense FW .Please provide the cli command (Comware 7)how to configure in MSR810  .Singapore site has configured their FW as configuration in attachment HQSG-pfSense.txt and Hong Kong configuration file are attachment H3CMSR810.txt

pfSense FW
-----------------
HQSG(WAN):321.321.321.321/28
Local LAN:192.168.100.0/24
H3CMSR810.txt
HQSG-pfSense.txt
0
Hello Everyone,

I am working to set up a raspberry pi as a vpn through my pfsense router. I have the pi configured and I am now having issues getting it to pass through the firewall to a public ip. If that won't work I'm looking for a username/password based vpn akin to pptp to add simplicity for my users (they don't want to use another client like open vpn) I'm fairly new to configuring vpns and I'm looking for a little guidance.
0

Internet Protocol Security

Internet Protocol Security (IPsec) is a protocol suite for secure Internet Protocol (IP) communications by authenticating and encrypting each IP packet of a communication session. IPsec includes protocols for establishing mutual authentication between agents at the beginning of the session and negotiation of cryptographic keys to be used during the session. IPsec can be used in protecting data flows between a pair of hosts (host-to-host), between a pair of security gateways (network-to-network), or between a security gateway and a host (network-to-host). IPsec is an end-to-end security scheme operating in the Internet Layer of the Internet Protocol Suite.

Top Experts In
Internet Protocol Security